|
Economy versus Octane Rating
Have you got a reasonably late model car (EFI, unleaded)? If so, you might like
to do some comparison tests as we did. Our car is a VL Commodore 3l auto wagon
which happens to have the slightly higher performance Nissan engine usually
fitted in the R31 GTS Nissan cars.
To make matters worse it has just about all the power robbing fuel-burning
options available. Being a miser of Irish descent and having a background in
motorsport I decided to investigate 98 octane fuels for improved performance.
First step was to establish a reliable basis to work from, so the car (not just
the engine) was thoroughly serviced and all worn or tired parts replaced. Not
surprisingly the car was noticeably improved!
Second step was to build a dataset of recorded fuel refills, kilometres
travelled, type of use (ie country or city, weather conditions etc) and cost
per litre for each refill using ULP.
Third step was to repeat this dataset gathering, this time using PULP fuel. Note
that in both cases we used a total distance of more than 8000 km to minimise
any weird errors.
Analysing those datasets we were able to select about 3200 km from each where
the type of use was a close match and this was then used to calculate an
average cost per kilometre. PULP generally averages 5 to 6% more than ULP in SA
but we achieved a REDUCTION in running fuel costs of approximately 2.1%!!
In addition there was a noticeable improvement in performance (acceleration and
manifold vacuum at cruise). When we used the whole of each dataset the results
only varied by 0.09% so selecting a match was a waste of time!
Fourth step was to retune the engine by installing a 'performance chip' in the
factory ECU and re-establishing the base settings of the engine to suit. The
same dataset gathering was performed and the results analysed. Interestingly,
there was a significant reduction in fuel cost compared to the baseline ULP
data (around 8.9%) but at the expense of a $200 addition to the car and with
some increased harshness to the engine characteristics.
My conclusion was that PULP was a significant advantage, but it really wasn't
worth putting the 'performance chip' in the car ($200 buys a LOT of fuel when
the gains are this small!). I removed the chip and returned the engine to its
standard base settings Note that prior to the chip nothing was done to the car
other than what would be required of normal thorough maintenance.
So, my recommendation is to take it step by step as we did and see if YOU might
also gain from using PULP. If your car is specified in the factory data as
having a compression figure over 9:1, has a turbocharger or supercharger, is a
multi-valve or multi-cam or comes from a line of engines with a motorsport
heritage then the probability is high that the results will justify the effort.
Art from Manoora, SA
|